![how to redact a pdf in adobe standard how to redact a pdf in adobe standard](https://static.bhphotovideo.com/explora/sites/default/files/29434-ts1.png)
Since Redax creates a new blank document, the only information retained is that specifically requested by the user – the text and metadata they affirmatively chose NOT to redact. Gavin went on to explain that Acrobat’s method forces the application (and the user) to locate and remove all of the document metadata with an extra step, even custom metadata that Acrobat knows nothing about. In principle, no redaction workflow should EVER put the original document at risk. Inattentive users and system crashes are known threats to be engineered around. The problem arises because Acrobat merely offers the user a ‘Save As” opportunity rather than assuming that the redacted file must be, of necessity, a new version of the document… a redacted version. Redax’s redaction method, by contrast, makes it pretty much impossible to damage the original document. That’s a pretty harsh penalty for a easy fumble with a single keystroke. Someone who makes this mistake while redacting in Acrobat 8 Pro, will be running for the backup tapes – if there are any. I’m not exactly the average user, so this got me thinking. As I saw for myself almost as soon as I started redacting with Acrobat 8 Pro, I managed to “nuke” my original document by carelessly doing something that’s routine for me in other document workflows – a “Save As” operation in which I over-write my original file before I’d even realized what I was doing. Thus, the new document has never been touched by the information to be redacted.”Īlthough Acrobat redacts the way you might intuitively expect (subtraction), this method is flawed. “Appligent creates a new blank document and then “adds” the non-redacted information into the new document. “Adobe takes an existing document and attempts to remove or “subtract” information,” says Gavin. OK, sounds technical… but redaction is redaction, right? Who cares how you zap it? This is where Gavin set me straight. “Appligent uses an “additive” redaction methodology while Adobe uses a “subtractive” redaction methodology.” “There are two primary differences between Adobe’s redaction and Appligent’s redaction,” Gavin says. I began by asking Mark to explain the basic difference in the way Redax and Acrobat redact PDF. I talked to Mark Gavin, founder and CTO of Appligent, to get his take.
![how to redact a pdf in adobe standard how to redact a pdf in adobe standard](https://www.shareus.com/img/software/how-to-reduce-pdf-file-size-in-adobe-acrobat-reader-dc/click-optimize-pdf.png)
To help me evaluate Acrobat 8 Pro’s new redaction tool, I wanted to find out more about how people use (or fail to use) the one PDF redaction tool that’s been available for over 10 years.
#HOW TO REDACT A PDF IN ADOBE STANDARD UPGRADE#
So you don’t need to upgrade to Acrobat 8 Professional to get PDF redaction. The latest version of Appligent’s Redax works with Acrobat Standard and Professional versions 6, 7 and 8. Acting on a request from Adobe, in 1996, Appligent developed and released the first version of Redax, which quickly became the definitive tool for serious redaction work on PDF files.
#HOW TO REDACT A PDF IN ADOBE STANDARD SOFTWARE#
Thus far, Acrobat 8’s redaction tool has been generally well received in principle, although a few discriminating reviewers have also noted a key concern with the method Adobe chose for redaction in Acrobat 8.0, as we shall see.Īcrobat 8 Professional is the first Adobe software to include a redaction feature for PDF, but it’s not the first.
![how to redact a pdf in adobe standard how to redact a pdf in adobe standard](https://images.wondershare.com/pdfelement/top-pdf-software/nitro-pro.png)
This handy tool allowing users to permanently eliminate text or graphics from a PDF page. One of the new features in Acrobat 8.0 Professional garnering significant comment is redaction.